Page 1 of 7

Southampton

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:04 pm
by slobbydan sillibic
Sky blues , nothing to play for get on the piss the night before and begin the game with a couldn`t give a flying attitude.. and win 0-2...... the iron leapfrog the saints who then have to endure the play-offs

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:06 pm
by Roger Mellie
I do expect us to win tomorrow, especially now we've managed to keep Thorn out of Barca's clutches.

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:20 pm
by the boss
if we win tomorrow I will be gutted [smilie=icon_ashamed.gif] Have a bet that West spam don't go up so watch City make me pay :lol:

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:55 pm
by Burf
calm down dears....we won't win.

There's more chance of me cutting something accurately with a jigsaw....

Southampton

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 2:22 pm
by Realist
Best get a laser guided jigsaw.

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 3:07 pm
by Burf
:idea:

brilliant ! wish I'd thought of that..... :D

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:07 pm
by plastic scouser
I switched off at 4-0 down and did some gardening instead. . . So actually quite surprised that it stayed at 4. Roll on the cricket.

Southampton

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:21 pm
by Realist
My mate bet me 5€ it would be 6-0 at the time we were 4-0 down. Even I was surprised it didn't happen, I took the bet because I thought Saints would hit 7.


---
I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?huy0r0

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:40 pm
by king chillout
I've been saying all week at work that Southampton would score at least four. Got a mate to look up the odds on a 4-0 win yesterday and for a fiver I would have only got around £22 plus my stake. I didn't bother.

Didn't bother watching the game on telly, either.

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 6:52 pm
by the boss
Realist wrote:My mate bet me 5€ it would be 6-0 at the time we were 4-0 down. Even I was surprised it didn't happen, I took the bet because I thought Saints would hit 7.


---
I am here: http://tapatalk.com/map.php?huy0r0



what the fuck you doing in Spain ?

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:14 pm
by The Yid
Thought they did their best considering it was virtually our Academy team against the runners up in the Championship. Hussey and Baker were out best players on the day.

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:18 pm
by the boss
The Yid wrote:Thought they did their best considering it was virtually our Academy team against the runners up in the Championship. Hussey and Baker were out best players on the day.



exactamondo 8)

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 8:16 pm
by king chillout
I've just found out via Facebook that my Norwich supporting mate backed City to win !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

He must have been the only bloke in Great Britain to have done that, surely ?

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:10 pm
by adge
The Yid wrote:Thought they did their best considering it was virtually our Academy team against the runners up in the Championship. Hussey and Baker were out best players on the day.
If that was their best I wouldn't like to see the worst even if it was our academy side. Sunday pub team players would have shown more balls than that shower.

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:47 am
by The Yid
adge wrote:
The Yid wrote:Thought they did their best considering it was virtually our Academy team against the runners up in the Championship. Hussey and Baker were out best players on the day.
If that was their best I wouldn't like to see the worst even if it was our academy side. Sunday pub team players would have shown more balls than that shower.


Right then... So basically you are either the most miserable bastard ever, or more likely - you know absolutely fuck all about football.

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:20 am
by Roger Mellie
To be fair if you're suggesting that Baker had a good game it's you who knows zip all. He's a terrible player.

Made poor decisions throughout the game and wasted possession numerous times.

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 9:23 am
by adge
Roger Mellie wrote:To be fair if you're suggesting that Baker had a good game it's you who knows zip all. He's a terrible player.

Made poor decisions throughout the game and wasted possession numerous times.
Spot on! Must say i was impressed with Baker everytime he over hit those crosses of his! :roll:

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:08 am
by the boss
Roger Mellie wrote:To be fair if you're suggesting that Baker had a good game it's you who knows zip all. He's a terrible player.

Made poor decisions throughout the game and wasted possession numerous times.



so he is the most miserable bastard ever :lol:

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:24 am
by The Yid
adge wrote:
Roger Mellie wrote:To be fair if you're suggesting that Baker had a good game it's you who knows zip all. He's a terrible player.

Made poor decisions throughout the game and wasted possession numerous times.
Spot on! Must say i was impressed with Baker everytime he over hit those crosses of his! :roll:


I was suggesting that out of our players he didn't shy away and hide which he could have easily done. Yes I agree his crosses were poor but at least he tried to create the opportunities by getting in those positions.

Is there any players we have you actually like???

Re: Southampton

PostPosted: Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:35 am
by Roger Mellie
Well bravo to him for doing the bare minimum!! Jesus, no wonder this club is fucked.